But you can browse through all the individual ones on this page (for convenience). It has links to all the individual tutorials. Here is the introduction, which is sort of a master tutorial. While there are only 3 ways to do it (auto-trace, or "manual" trace with Pen/Bezier tool, or build the image with other Inkscape tools), there are many things to consider about your particular goal.
#INKSCAPE VS EAZYDRAW SERIES#
I recently wrote a series of tutorials about converting raster images to vector. So maybe you need to choose a better or different original. But it may also take forever to trace by hand. So if you can't achieve as much detail as you would gain by hand tracing, I would say, why bother, and just use the auto trace.Īnd you also have to consider your original raster image. And I can imagine that some kinds of wood are more prone to splintering or chipouts, making certain detail very difficult. But I'm somewhat familiar with woodworking. I've never used anything like a CNC or laser cutter before. But you have to be mindful of how much detail the the laser etching can accomplish on whatever material you're using.
#INKSCAPE VS EAZYDRAW MANUAL#
The manual trace will always give you the best detail. Deciding whether you should use the auto-trace or manual trace. Well, you were on the right track to begin with.
#INKSCAPE VS EAZYDRAW HOW TO#
And once we can see the image, we can give you some more commentsīrynn, would you be kind enough to walk me through your thoughts etc I would love to learn how to do this "properly" or "correctly" as I suspect I'll need to know this! So it's only 2 things: 1 - how complex is the image, and 2 - how much detail you want for the end result. I was just helping someone else who is using a cutter, so I had you mixed up for a minute.Īnyway, I guess a laser printer can handle almost any amount of detail. 1 - how complex the image is and 2 - how much detail the.oh, you said laser printer. The choice of whether you trace "manually" with the Pen/Bezier tool, or use the automated Trace Bitmap, depends on 3 things (as I see it). So that at least limits how many people might see it. Or you could attach the image to this thread (or upload to a file sharing site) and as soon as we solve the problem, you can delete it. Or if you don't want the image to be seen publically, maybe someone would be willing to help privately, via email. And only 1 person will be able to help (as Moini mentioned). If you use PM, you'll only be able to give us a link to it, because attachments are not available for PMs. no paint for either option seems incorrect.ģ) Given my total lack of knowledge with this, i was considering would it be easier to just load the image, add a layer on top and manually 'trace' the image resulting in the perfect outline then set each bit to etch / cut? (then deleting the under-layer before saving the output). Am concerned a dummy run with the above would overtax the laser with incorrect fill options for "cut" / "etch" and multiple unneeded passes.Ģ) is there a simple way to convert from etch to cut or visa versa? I think the auto convert is taking bits incorrectly? how i understand it there must be two lines, one for start of etch and one for start of cut? if I remove the cut line does that solve the problem? <- total n00b question here but it struck me the other night. Given the above I don't think I can use the auto convert output without cleaning it up / editing. my go to image editing background is just "touch up / re-sketch" this section on screen but it doesn't work like that does it? The Path>Trace Bitmap option and I have a couple of concerns:ġ) the output will need to be tweaked / cleaned up / smoothed - and when I attempt to do this either its not pretty.
Some details of what I've been messing with: or 2) manually draw the image into a layer, delete the under layer and use that.Īre either of these overkill? have i missed an option? which would be easier / produce a more refined result etc? would one put more stress on the laser than the other due to not clean / possibly incorrect cut / etch identifiers etc? The end result is basically to etch the designs onto materials etc.Įither way how i understand it, image in> the paths created are essentially the required output for the laser, i think some need colour coding / thickness settings, correct? In short I've been playing with two ideas - 1) using the trace bitmap tool / conversion option. Hoping someone can help, been reading up & messing around with converting / creating images for a laser cutter however I think i'm getting lost in the detail.
0 kommentar(er)
